Home >> Tag Archives: Informatics/information technology (see also Automation; Digital pathology; Information systems)

Tag Archives: Informatics/information technology (see also Automation; Digital pathology; Information systems)

Digital pathology now, and where to from here

Nearly 800 registrants were at the Digital Pathology Association’s Pathology Visions meeting this fall, and 54 companies exhibited. “There was a great vibe at the meeting. People were mingling, collaborative. Digital pathology is picking up,” says DPA president Esther Abels. Her term as president will end this month and Liron Pantanowitz, MD, PhD, MHA, of the University of Michigan, will step in as president on Jan. 1.

Read More »

Artificial intelligence in pathology: the tools, the talk

December 2022—In September, when CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle met with pathologists and representatives of companies to talk about laboratory information systems (“Lab information systems—where the needs are greatest,” https://bit.ly/LIS_112022), they talked also about artificial intelligence—innovations, clinical impact, how much interest there is. That part of their conversation follows.

Read More »

Closing the workflow loop: HistoQC for digital slides

July 2020—Unveiled in 2018, HistoQC, an open-source quality control tool for digital pathology slides, was an “awakening to a problem” and the kickoff of a conversation, says Andrew Janowczyk, PhD, its main investigator. And while it’s hard to measure the tool’s use because it’s freely available, he says, reception has been strong. “It’s been a pretty good ride,” he says of its first two years.

Read More »

LIS roundtable: The conversation continues—consolidation, IT labor force

December 2019—IT as it relates to laboratory consolidation and the labor supply for lab IT were some of what came up when CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle convened a panel in September to talk about laboratory information systems. Part one of the discussion is in the November issue (with the LIS product guide); part two begins here. On the panel were J. Mark Tuthill, MD, of Henry Ford Health System, Curt Johnson of Orchard Software, Wally Soufi of NovoPath, Michelle Del Guercio of Sunquest Information Systems, Nick Trentadue of Epic, Sepehr Seyedzadeh of Siemens Healthineers, and Tony Barresi of Beckman Coulter.

Read More »

Panel explores urinalysis solutions, rules, POC testing

December 2019—What do users of urinalysis systems want? According to those in the know, the answer is instruments that are scalable and modular, maximize automation, reduce hands-on time, improve workflow, and more. CAP TODAY publisher Bob McGonnagle convened a panel in October to discuss these topics and other aspects of urinalysis testing. On the panel were Megan Nakashima, MD, of Cleveland Clinic; Michelle Dumonceaux, of Beckman Coulter; Maya Daaboul, of Siemens Healthineers; and Jason Anderson, MPH, MT(ASCP), of Sysmex. What they said follows.

Read More »

A killer app comes out of the crowd

July 2019—Twenty years ago, Ulysses Balis, MD, bought the domain name Histo­Query.org. He had realized that one day, digital pathology would be sophisticated enough to be incorporated into interactive, Web-based tools, so he did what any self-styled geek would do with such a nascent idea—he waited.

Read More »

Digital pathology matchmaking: people, pixels

February 2019—Digital pathology is many things. One thing it’s not is a one-night stand. As laboratories contemplate using digital pathology for primary diagnosis in the wake of the FDA’s approval nearly two years ago, it’s become abundantly clear that while digital pathology might seem to promise easy pleasure, it’s actually as complicated as keeping multiple spouses happy. Think Jacob, Rachel, and Leah. Think “Big Love.”

Read More »

Look, wait, buy: labs share instrument plans

July 2018—“Robbie,” the autonomous service robot that transfers specimens for Florida Hospital’s central laboratory, may not quite be ready for his gold watch. But after five years of faithful service delivering samples between the different esoteric testing units, he’s nearing the end of his natural lifespan with signs of wear.

Read More »

Skirting the pitfalls of merging lab results

May 2018—“One of these things is not like the others” is a fun puzzle for kids in the context of Sesame Street. But it can be a vexing informatics challenge when you are managing data entered in fields in a database. For anyone charged with merging outside laboratory results into an institution’s electronic health record alongside results from an in-house laboratory, the differences can generate no end of headaches.

Read More »

Next-gen sequencing workflow in full spate

April 2016—With next-generation sequencing’s clear benefits—for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and trials—come its new challenges, and clinical laboratories are doing what it takes and sharing how. Two plenary speakers at last year’s meeting of the Association for Molecular Pathology spoke of variant calling in the bioinformatic pipeline and validation, and of clinical reporting. Colin Pritchard, MD, PhD, of the University of Washington and one of the speakers, sees reporting a genomic sequencing assay as more like making a histologic diagnosis, which he calls craftwork, than reporting a sodium value. “That’s an idea that hasn’t really permeated yet,” he said.

Read More »

Broadening the productivity spectrum with middleware

March 2016—As James Beck, MT(ASCP), remembers it, middleware was introduced at his institution about the same time that the nursing department decided connectivity should be the province of the laboratory. When the concept of docking and interfacing glucose testing devices came on the scene around the turn of the millennium, that was a turning point, says Beck, who is point-of-care testing coordinator for the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center–St. Margaret, which uses the Telcor middleware solution QML.

Read More »

Interface validation: abort, retry, succeed

February 2015—When you go looking for problems, you’re bound to find them. That truism is especially pertinent in the arena of interface validation, as the team at New York’s North Shore-LIJ Health System discovered recently. The laboratory professionals there were charged with helping to implement the first phase of a joint venture with New York City’s Health and Hospitals Corp. (HHC), in which North Shore-LIJ would serve as the massive public health system’s primary reference lab.

Read More »

LIS to EHR: Is results transmission what it should be?

January 2015—While no one would question the virtues of accurate laboratory results, a recently concluded Q-Probes study is a new reminder that alone they’re not enough. Results should be reviewed before a lab goes live with a new interface that transmits results to the electronic health record, as well as when changes are made at the laboratory or EHR level that could alter test resulting. They also should be reviewed periodically, say the authors of the study, titled “Validating Laboratory Results in Electronic Health Records.”

Read More »

Full speed ahead through tight corners

December 2014—Like sailing ships, laboratories hope for fair winds as they chart their business plans. But smooth sailing is never a sure bet; rough sea conditions are an ever-present possibility that can make ships hard to steer. Perhaps the tide is with the vessel but the winds are against it. That’s a situation that could aptly describe a health care system facing a growing patient population at the same time that hospital admissions and reimbursement are in decline.

Read More »

Seamless automation: within reach for AP?

August 2014—A familiar optical illusion uses a drawing of a vase that makes your eyes play tricks. First you see the vase, then two faces gazing at each other, then again, the vase…two faces…ad infinitum. It’s a concept that comes to mind when thinking about “tracking” in the anatomic pathology laboratory. Does it refer to a physical track—a conveyor belt to automatically transport and sort specimens—or to a system for “tracking”—that is, electronically keeping tabs on specimens?

Read More »

Taking aim at overuse: daily labs, high-cost send-outs

April 2014—As reimbursement models change, achieving better test utilization will become a survival strategy. And in the hard work to improve test use, the computerized physician order-entry system appears to be the work tool with the winning record. Inpatient laboratory tests at Massachusetts General Hospital fell by 21 percent between 2002 and 2007, despite a seven percent increase in the number of discharges. Per discharge, inpatient tests dropped by 26 percent (Kim JY, et al. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:108–118). Kent B. Lewandrowski, MD, associate chief of pathology and director of laboratory and molecular medicine at MGH and professor of pathology at Harvard Medical School, calls the number of inpatient tests per discharge “a global benchmark,” saying, “It rolls up all of our individual utilization initiatives.”

Read More »

How high-tech approach may reshape the autopsy

March 2014—Boosters of so-called virtual autopsy say it has the potential to revolutionize the practice of forensic pathology and could help increase the share of U.S. deaths subject to medical autopsy. The technique involves the use of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and three-dimensional surface scanning technology to help resolve tricky forensic questions such as whether a woman was killed with a hammer or a bicycle wrench.

Read More »

IT drives clinical, financial gains in hospital labs

February 2014—For “quants”—people who love all things numeric or algorithmic—information technology is its own reason for being. But for those with responsibility for clinical outcomes and the bottom line in the clinical laboratory, IT is much, much more. Innovative uses of IT are providing myriad new solutions with measurable paybacks in quality improvement and cost reduction.

Read More »
CAP TODAY
X