Home >> Tag Archives: Cytopathology In Focus —

Tag Archives: Cytopathology In Focus —

Cytopathology in focus: How can a lab ensure individual competence?

January 2019—It is happening again: CAP members and cytotechnologists are asking about regulatory requirements for re-integrating into cytopathology after a period of practice latency. That is good news because it indicates that they are interested in practicing at a time when the cytopathology community can use skilled professionals. The past decade has seen a shrinking volume of Pap tests and a concomitant decline in the number of practicing cytologists, which has created new job opportunities for those with cytopathology skills.

Read More »

Cytopathology in focus: Next-generation cytotechnology—new cytotechnologist roles

January 2019—The evolution of minimally invasive techniques and new diagnostic modalities have placed new demands on medical laboratories. Cytotechnologists find themselves uniquely poised to take on these new responsibilities, using their morphologic and analytical skills. In this article, I summarize potential roles for cytotechnologists that go beyond screening cytology slides to add value and improve quality in the clinical laboratory.

Read More »

Cytopathology in Focus: Synergy in cytopathology and molecular microbiology

August 2018—In today’s less-is-more world, health care consumers and providers often seek explicit and detailed information from minimally invasive procedures and tiny samples. Over are the days of “malignant cells present” and on to the next case. Cytopathologists and cytotechnologists are embracing and integrating novel techniques and applying new methods to the diagnosis and classification of essentially every imaginable form of neoplasia. The 2018 WHO publications confirm that 29 percent of deaths worldwide (more than 10 million people annually) are attributable to communicable diseases.1,2 This means the purpose of procuring many specimens is not to just rule out malignancy but also to diagnose infectious etiologies.

Read More »

Cytopathology in Focus: Why not call everything ASCUS?

August 2018—Below is a question shared on the ASC listserv. My reply to the question follows. A pathologist colleague who practiced previously as an obstetrician/gynecologist is of the opinion that categorizing the level of abnormality we observe on a Pap test is a waste of time. All the clinician needs to know, he says, is whether the test is normal or abnormal. The Pap test is a screening test, he says correctly, and its only relevance is in pointing out who needs a colposcopy and biopsy.

Read More »

Cytopathology in Focus: Reporting salivary gland cytopathology—new user-friendly Milan system consists of six diagnostic categories

May 2018—The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology was published Jan. 31 and is an important step toward standardizing the reporting of salivary gland fine needle aspiration. A large body of literature has demonstrated that FNA is an effective method for the initial evaluation of salivary gland masses, but until this year there was no uniform, widely accepted reporting system. The complexity of salivary gland cytology poses unique challenges that demand a standardized approach to communication of diagnostic information between pathologists and treating clinicians.

Read More »

Cytopathology in Focus: For thyroid cytopathology, the 2017 Bethesda System

May 2018—Surgical pathologists take their tumor nomenclature from the WHO Classification of Tumours, but cytopathologists take their terminology from where the consensus groups convened—Bethesda, Paris, Milan, and Yokohama—to formulate terminology recommendations. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC)1 is now in its second edition.

Read More »
X