Home >> Tag Archives: Test ordering

Tag Archives: Test ordering

And the band neutrophil counts play on​

December 2023—The recent CAP proficiency testing questionnaire was meant to be the coup de grâce. Hematology PT participants were asked about their band neutrophil reporting practices and, given that these manually generated counts were supposedly on their way out decades ago, the authors of the survey questionnaire expected to see very little activity. The survey, they hoped, would be a way to pound the final, data-driven nail in the coffin. Or, as lead author Maria (Ria) Vergara-Lluri, MD, puts it, “We thought this had all been laid to rest 30 years ago.” It wasn’t. Says Dr. Vergara-Lluri: “Surprise: 86 percent of labs that participated still report bands.” The results of the survey upended many of the assumptions, if not hopes, the authors might have had. Among laboratories that reported manual differentials, they found that most reported bands (4,554 of 5,268). Moreover, only 73 percent reported band reference ranges. On the morphologic challenge, bands classified as “easy” were indeed easy—participants classified them well.

Read More »

Colorectal cancer next on HER2 horizon

May 2023—Behold the common coin. Note its two sides, its easy flippability. Here is Joseph Pizzolato, MD, with the first coin toss. Given the expanded use of biomarkers with a variety of tumors, and constantly evolving assays, how hard is it for medical oncologists to navigate testing? “It’s not difficult at all now,” says a cheerful Dr. Pizzolato, medical director of the comprehensive therapeutic unit of Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, as well as medical director of the Aventura satellite at Sylvester. With third-party companies integrating test ordering directly into electronic medical records, he adds, “It’s getting even easier to order tests and see the results.” Agreed, says his colleague Rhonda Yantiss, MD, director of surgical pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. And therein lies the problem. “It’s kind of a mess,” she says. In practice, precision medicine is becoming both more and less precise.

Read More »

Growing pains put gene panels in a pinch

April 2023—After years of excitement and scientific breakthroughs, the use of molecular testing to guide cancer therapeutics finally is coming into its own. Unfortunately, it appears to have landed in the wrong place at the right time. That place is a lonely spot, surrounded by gaps in economics and coverage, as well as knowledge, guidelines, ordering patterns, turnaround times, reporting, and the like. So plentiful are the gaps that, put together, they could form a vast, inhospitable space, a veritable Colorado Plateau, with molecular testing as a majestic, enticing but remote rocky pinnacle in the middle. Think Monument Valley. It’s worth the trek. The evidence in support of genomic profiling continues to grow. Simply put, “Patients with the right markers who get the right drugs do better,” says Neal Lindeman, MD, vice chair, laboratory medicine and molecular pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital. But as numerous studies are showing, the lag in testing is growing as well.

Read More »

Sorting out celiac disease with serologic testing

April 2023—Celiac disease incidence is up and the diagnostic rate is low, and it can be years from onset of symptoms to diagnosis. “It’s a long diagnostic odyssey, and so in the laboratory business, we’re all in to help,” says Annette Taylor, MS, PhD, associate vice president at Labcorp where she is strategic director of pharmacogenomics and scientific director of molecular genetics.

Read More »

After negative CT for brain injury, a biomarker gap

April 2023—Traumatic brain injury triage in the emergency department is badly in need of biomarkers—and ones that can change practice. “If biomarkers don’t change practice, they’re a waste of time,” said W. Frank Peacock IV, MD, professor of emergency medicine, vice chair of research, and research director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine.

Read More »

In coag collections, every detail counts

September 2021—Rare wine? Delectable. Rara avis? Magnificent. Rare blue-top collection tube? Uh oh. For Richard Marlar, PhD, coming across a non-FDA-approved tube was an unhappy discovery. Dr. Marlar, medical director, coagulation laboratory, University of New Mexico Hospital, says his lab was among the first to encounter one of these rogue tubes, available for purchase on the internet and likely taking wing due to pandemic supply shortages. When the tube arrived for testing, it quickly kindled concerns, says Dr. Marlar. “It’s a tube we had never seen before. It looks like it has a CE mark on it, and the Europeans don’t know anything about it. It has a label on it that suggests it’s FDA approved—but the FDA is not aware of it,” he says, adding that his lab has spoken with the agency. It feels like a “CSI”-tinged moment in a venue that labs would prefer to keep drama-free. It also points to the ongoing need to keep a keen eye on what passes through coagulation laboratories. It’s not so much that the devil is in the details; rather, that’s where accurate results lie.

Read More »

Problems, solutions at core of UTI, C. diff modules

April 2021—Urinary tract infections and Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile testing are the topics of two of the modules released recently in the CAP Test Ordering Program. The Laboratory Workup for Urinary Tract Infections module became available online in January, and C. difficile Testing in October 2020 (www.cap.org/member-resources/test-ordering-program). The program is free to CAP members.

Read More »

Markers, methods remake the NSCLC map

February 2021—Absorbing new biomarkers into lung cancer workups makes for a complicated diplomacy. How best to balance so many rivals? Does it make the most sense for laboratories to try to do everything at once, a full-court press involving next-generation sequencing panels? Or is it more practical to add a new marker only as a new targeted therapy receives approval? Where do RNA-based assays fit in? What about IHC? When do you make the switch? Or do you? And how best to handle cell-free DNA tests (which seem to be the rogue states in all this)? How do you weight external factors, such as reimbursement, existing equipment and capital expenditures, and physician expertise? Driving this all are medical breakthroughs. As with all forms of statecraft, the latest incident can change everything. For lung cancer, the most recent advance comes from the ADAURA trial, which showed a significant benefit of using osimertinib to treat stage IB to IIIA EGFR-mutation positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Read More »

Smart test ordering—new program provides the tools

February 2018—A new CAP program with a novel approach makes it easier to take on an old problem: misapplied laboratory tests. The CAP Test Ordering Program, available now and complimentary to all members, is different from other laboratory test utilization initiatives, says Richard W. Brown, MD, medical director for system laboratory services at Memorial Hermann Health System in Houston.

Read More »
CAP TODAY
X