Tag Archives: Standard of care

July 2022—Thanks to more than two years’ experience with SARS-CoV-2, perhaps at no point in U.S. history has the general public been as aware of antigen and PCR testing, and the difference between them, as it is now.

July 2022—Myriad questions had to be answered and plans made to put low titer O whole blood in the trauma bay at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Julie Katz Karp, MD, associate professor and director of transfusion medicine, reported why, when, and how it was done and where they stand today, in a process she describes as “a never-ending series of hoops.”

June 2022—By revealing the value of a diagnostic algorithm using quantitative RNA as the second test to confirm reactive HIV screening results, Daniel Gromer, MD, and colleagues say their simulation modeling suggests clinical improvement over the standard-of-care algorithm, and at lower cost if HIV specimen positivity is high.

September 2021—Taking steps to protect the integrity of specimens is at the heart of new and revised requirements in this year’s edition of the accreditation program checklists, set for release Sept. 22. A CAP team made up of members of the Checklists, Personalized Health Care, and Cytopathology committees collaborated to incorporate into the checklists the evidence-based recommendations set forth in a 2019 article on preanalytics and precision pathology. Many of the new and revised requirements, which are in seven checklists, are aimed at improving the quality of tissue and blood specimens that may undergo molecular testing for patients with cancer. The aim of others is to improve the preanalytic quality of specimens used for all types of testing.

May 2013—Town versus gown: It’s a long-standing source of tension in medicine. In November 1963, JAMA published a piece on the pathology of this so-called syndrome. The disease was characterized as both chronic and acute, with the author blaming social forces, the structure of medical practice, philosophical differences in medical education, and the rise of specialization, as well as a host of secondary etiologic factors. After much hand wringing, the author called for a renewal of spirit to end this classic divide.